|
Rationale for
Purchase
n
Sugar Cycle Attractively Poised at an Inflection
Point
Sugar like most other
commodities is cyclical in nature. Increased production of a
commodity like sugar year on year, leads to lower market price
realizations and higher inventory for the sugar mills. As a
result, there is financial pressure on the mills – leading to
higher arrears (amount due not paid) to farmers for the raw
material (sugar cane). Farmers, therefore switch to other crops,
reducing the cultivation area under that particular commodity.
This results in production of the commodity dropping and prices
rise. As a result sugar stocks behave differently, compared to
other common stocks.
The stock
prices of sugar companies increase at the beginning of the sugar
cycle. The beginning of sugar cycle is marked by a dip in
production after two to three years of continuous increased
production. We expect production for the sugar year SY’2002-2003
(Oct’2002 to Sep’2003) to fall by 7.85% to 170 lakh tones after
four years of continuous increased production, which would mark
the beginning of a new sugar cycle. We estimate, that the sugar
price is likely to bottom out around the levels of Rs.11.5-12
for M-30 variety and Rs.11.25-11.75 for S-30 variety (East U.P.
delivery rates) over the next few months. Most sugar companies
are likely to record one of their worst performance in FY’2003,
while their stock prices could bottom out much before the
results.
We expect,
sharp percentile growth in bottomline for most sugar companies
post FY’2003 results, primarily due to increased sugar prices
and also helped by the low base effect. In such a scenario, BCML
is likely to benefit most as the company’s sugar sells at a
premium to the market price. We expect BCML to post a 161.69%
growth in bottomline for FY’2004 at Rs.85.39 crores, compared to
estimated Rs.32.63 crores in FY’2003.
A look
at the chart below depicts how the sugar production in India,
has been steadily rising over the years. Sugar production has
steadily increased from 129 lakh tones in SY’98, to around 184.5
lakh tones in SY’2002, a CAGR of 9.4%. However, for the coming
SY’2003, production is likely to dip for the first time in over
four years to around 170 lakh tones, a decline of 7.85%.
Chart 1:
Sugar Production over the years (Lakh Tones).
§
Source: ISMA.
The fall in production by 7.85% to 170 lakh tones
for the Sugar Year 2003 should also help in bringing down the
huge inventory levels that is plaguing the industry. Closing
stock of sugar likely to fall by 14.81% to 103.50 lakh tones for
the Sugar Year 2003, compared to 121.50 lakh tones for the
current (Sugar Year) SY’2002. The chart in the next page (chart
2), depicts how the closing stock is slated to dip for the first
time after three years of consecutive increases.
Chart 2:
Closing Stock (Lakh Tones)

Sugar
Cane Trend over the Years
The sugar cane
crop has been in growth mode though there have been
fluctuations, with sharper increase in last 15 years. The growth
can be attributed to:
· Government’s
thrust on sugar production - planned growth.
· Govt./State
Agriculture Dept’s input on field extension, seed varieties and
crop maintenance.
· Cane
development programs of sugar mills.
· Increase
in cane support price covering more than input costs.
· Crop
switch resulting in more crop area in sugar cane due to better
return.
· Increased
irrigation facilities and increase in energy consumption for
irrigation.
· Favorable
monsoons.
Government fixes the price to be paid for the sugar cane every
year, which is known as Statutory Minimum Price (SMP). However,
SMP’s are not the cane price, which are actually paid to
farmers. Many sugar-producing states declare State Advised
Prices (SAPs) for canes, basing mostly on political criteria and
less on economic reasons. For the sugar year 2003, the U.P.
Government has again announced Rs.95/quintal as SAP.
However, this time most mills are not accepting to the above
cane price, as production would then be unviable keeping the
prevailing seven-year low sugar prices in mind.
A look
at the chart below depicts how the cane prices (raw material for
sugar) in Uttar Pradesh have been steadily rising since sugar
year 1991-1992, from Rs.45/Qtn. to around Rs.95/Qtn. for the
sugar year 2001-2002, a CAGR of 7.76%.
Table 1:
Statutory Minimum Price &
State
Advised Price Differential in U.P. (In Rs./Qtn.)
|
Years |
SMP |
SAP |
% Diff. |
|
1975-76 |
8.50 |
13.25 |
55.88 |
|
1980-81 |
13.00 |
19.00 |
46.15 |
|
1985-86 |
16.50 |
23.00 |
39.39 |
|
1990-91 |
23.00 |
41.00 |
78.26 |
|
1991-92 |
26.00 |
45.00 |
73.08 |
|
1992-93 |
31.00 |
46.00 |
48.39 |
|
1993-94 |
34.50 |
58.00 |
68.12 |
|
1994-95 |
39.10 |
66.00 |
68.80 |
|
1995-96 |
42.50 |
71.00 |
67.06 |
|
1996-97 |
45.90 |
72.00 |
56.86 |
|
1997-98 |
48.45 |
75.00 |
54.80 |
|
1998-99 |
52.70 |
80.00 |
51.80 |
|
1999-00 |
56.10 |
85.00 |
51.52 |
|
2000-2001 |
59.50 |
90.00 |
51.26 |
|
2001-2002 |
64.00 |
95.00 |
48.44 |
Chart 3:
Closing SMP & SAP

Back to the VCK
|